5.3.1 Рызыкі, звязаныя з традыцыйным эканамічным ростам

A few essential tenets serve as the foundation for a regenerative approach to economic development. Secondly, wealth is something that every society, including those with limited resources, possesses by nature. This wealth manifests itself in a variety of ways, including as through shared infrastructures, governance, small and large businesses, natural abundance, culture, and climate. When it is acknowledged, community members may manage and develop this wealth. Those who are prepared to coordinate their efforts to create well-being for everybody, including non-humans, can revive it even in situations when it has been severely deteriorated. Because this richness is rooted in a community’s personality and spirit rather than its wealth, every community has the opportunity to build it. The question is how to increase their capacity to access and expand this riches in ways that are beneficial to everyone, not just a favored few. The idea that regeneration involves living wholes is a second tenet. 

At its most basic level, this entails a commitment to assisting each and every person in realizing their potential and making significant contributions to society. It also entails giving in to the possibility of other living systems, such as communities and ecosystems. This differs significantly from a strategy that aims to manage a small resource pool and extract value out of them as the foundation of an economy. In order to create a continuously expanding pool of shared wealth, a regenerative economy aims to boost everyone and everything’s capacity to generate value.

Супольнасці праводзяць ініцыятывы эканамічнага развіцця ў розных кантэкстах па ўсім свеце, каб забяспечыць свой доўгатэрміновы дабрабыт. Занадта часта гэтыя ініцыятывы ў галіне развіцця маюць разнастайныя згубныя наступствы, асабліва для непрывілеяваных або пазбаўленых правоў. Гэтыя наступствы могуць уключаць у сябе выкарчоўванне, гентрыфікацыю, дэзінтэграцыю сацыяльнай або экалагічнай тканіны або захаванне практык, якія сістэматычна кідаюць жанчын, каляровых людзей, а таксама іншыя групы ў галечу на працягу дзесяцігоддзяў. Некаторыя ініцыятывы па эканамічным развіцці маюць непрадбачаныя наступствы - памяншэнне грамадскага дабрабыту, а не яго павелічэнне.

For instance, the prosperity of Valle de Bravo, a well-liked weekend resort for Mexico City’s wealthiest citizens, has put tremendous strain on the town’s natural and sociocultural systems. Poor farmers and indigenous communities have been forced to sell the agricultural areas they had previously owned collectively in order to make a living from low-wage jobs due to the increasing demand for homes. This change in the use of land from agricultural to urbanization has resulted in a real estate boom for rich developers but has done very little to make life better for rural residents, creating friction in the community. Failures in strategic thinking frequently exacerbate the structural disempowerment of some community groups. For instance, many towns rely on outside experts, best practices, or expensive incentives to entice major corporations rather than investing in their own inherent riches and in-house talent. Even though these imported ideas were successful in the environments in which they were developed, they frequently fail to successfully blend into the fundamental nature of the groups into which they are brought. The entire foundation of their innate wealth is eroded by this.

Калі праграмы распрацоўваюцца вакол пэўных пытанняў, патрабаванняў, парадку дня, мэтаў або магчымасцей фінансавання, намаганні па эканамічным развіцці могуць стаць фрагментаванымі і нават неэфектыўнымі. Яны даюць абмежаваныя адчувальныя вынікі і не дасягаюць запланаваных сістэмных паляпшэнняў, калі не ўключаны ў жыццё і магчымасці супольнасці. Больш за тое, гэтыя ініцыятывы часта не могуць прымусіць мясцовых жыхароў думаць, клапаціцца пра іх і інвеставаць у іх.

While valuable on some level, initiatives like switching to renewable energy sources, building bike lanes, or emphasizing affordable housing do not by themselves have profound systemic consequences for a community. In the worst instance, such interventions can have a harmful effect on communities because they are frequently reactive and opportunistic. For instance, turning a deserted industrial zone into a bustling business center could increase a city’s tax base and vitality. Yet, it might easily lead to the loss of nearby low-income communities, which could result in their displacement and a reduction in their underlying wealth and potential rather than an increase.