6.2 Lekce 2: Investice z regenerativní mysli

Myšlenka dopadové investice, jejímž cílem je využít finanční bohatství jako prostředek k dosažení zlepšení ve světě, je ta, kterou banky, instituce, korporace a lidé stále více přijímají. Investoři s dopadem obvykle investují do projektů nebo společností, o kterých se domnívají, že mohou mít pákový dopad na konkrétní potřebu, jako je obnova životního prostředí, zmírnění chudoby nebo snížení atmosférického uhlíku. Tato strategie se liší od tradiční filantropie, protože jejím cílem je vydělat peníze. Dopadoví investoři se domnívají, že je to nejlepší způsob, jak podpořit iniciativu a podnikatelského ducha a zároveň zajistit, aby bylo k dispozici financování pro více investic.

Impact investování se zrodilo z upřímné touhy změnit svět a přinést významnou transformaci toho, jak lidé na planetě žijí. Obecně řečeno, má za cíl buď zmírnit sociálně-ekologické škody (s využitím paradigmatu zástavy zatčení), nebo posunout lidské i přírodní systémy.

Chceme představit alternativní strategii pro dopadové investování, která je založena na regenerativním paradigmatu a jejím cílem je jít nad rámec drobných úprav k aktualizaci celých systémů.

A paradigm shift to the regeneration level entails much more than just a simple adjustment to an investor’s approach. It essentially calls for a shift in the way individuals perceive and comprehend their interaction with the outside environment. Because regeneration calls for people to invest themselves as well as their material assets, it also necessitates a change in aspiration and direction toward the activity of investment. Together, this means that it necessitates creating a regenerative mind.

The term “mind” refers to all conscious and unconscious mental activity and processes, such as emotion, habit, reasoning, sensory perception, and so forth. Regeneration is the process of drawing out something’s essence and allowing it to evolve so that it can manifest in a new way and add fresh value to a new environment. Seeing the intrinsic completeness, agency, and potentiality in living phenomena, a regenerative mind actively engages with their innate capacity for regeneration.

Company owners and entrepreneurs who are looking for ways to boost their positive impacts on social and ecological systems. They almost always show a sincere desire to make the world a better place: “We want to make a difference,” they declare. These noble intentions, however, are rarely matched by knowledge and procedures sophisticated enough to bring about lasting change. This is typically the case because the desire to do good is anchored in an outmoded paradigm that has an anthropocentric view of the universe. Those who want to improve the world will naturally define and work toward what they regard as right and good. The same concerns are raised in relation to investment, which has recently seen its definition change. For instance, it is becoming increasingly clear that the phrase need not just refer to traditional financial instruments that offer the promise of a financial return. Moreover, the term “investment” can be used to describe the commitment (or “self-investment”) that involves something besides money, with the hope of receiving positive results.

Impact investing, on the other hand, is concentrated on making it possible for whole-systems actualization to occur. The process through which a system’s innate potential manifests or becomes actual is known as actualization. As a result, it can be inferred that an impact effort is regenerative if it results in systemic changes or evolutionary processes that reveal potential new for a system as a whole. This is very different from assessing consequences in terms of changes in a desired but constrained metric, such the number of homeless individuals who have received housing.

A different investment orientation is necessary to redefine impact in terms of systems actualization. For starters, it necessitates understanding how systems are layered within one another and viewing systems as wholes as opposed to bits and pieces. Additionally, it begins with a system’s nature and questions how it will evolve rather than starting with what we wish to change about it.

Při pohledu z regenerativní perspektivy se investice již nepovažují za něco, co se přináší, aby přineslo změnu (paradigma konat dobro), ale spíše jako něco, co systém volá, aby usnadnil svůj vlastní vývoj (paradigma regenerace života). mimo konvenční chápání a přijímanou praxi je nezbytné, aby se rozvinulo myšlení, které je skutečně nové, aby bylo možné uskutečnit objevy vyššího řádu pro život na Zemi. K tomu je třeba mít pochopení základních pohybů a energií, které slouží jako základ pro inovativní taktiky, které umožňují systémům změnit se na vyšší stupeň vyjádření a realizovat svůj vlastní potenciál.

The mind of a regenerative investor must also be regenerative. To do this, one must be prepared to go beyond education and experience in to understand and interact with the environment in novel ways. That is a lengthy, difficult procedure. After all, letting go of one’s certainties and the things that have historically worked is never an easy task. But at this pivotal time in history, this kind of course correction is required. The framework that follows provides an overview of the extent of a process for developing fresh perspectives that make it possible to identify and realize the inherent potential of living systems.

• The phrase “essence-to-essence link” describes the mentality one must adopt: one that recognizes and respects the unique qualities and untapped potential of every living system. We must learn to relate to them as autonomous beings if we are to transition from acting on to working with the natural systems, raw resources, local cultures, and people that our investments and enterprises influence.
• The term “systems evolution” refers to the capacity to see a world of process, dynamism, and flow in which life develops to its full potential and becomes richer, more structured, and more complicated. This applies to the evolution of economies, animals, and ecosystems, as well as societies, and it necessitates accepting ambiguity and uncertainty as the building blocks of original ideas.
• Myšlení živých systémů je proces, jehož prostřednictvím může mysl modelovat své jednání podle toho, jak fungují živé systémy. Například teorie živých systémů klade větší důraz na celky než na fragmenty, na potenciál než na realitu, na podstatu než na obecné kategorie a tak dále.
• Self-managing and self-determining systems must be capable of managing themselves and making decisions for themselves. This is crucial to shifting relationships with biological systems from extractive or authoritarian to regenerative. At the regenerative level, investing always aims to increase communities’, individuals’, and ecosystems’ capacity to successfully shape their own futures. When this is the case, businesses and investors are appropriately viewed as allies as opposed to predators.
• The ability to keep track of one’s own thoughts and determine which paradigm is influencing it is referred to as discernment levels. Because to ingrained habits and social constraints, working at a regeneration level is impossible without this skill. Instead, one will automatically shift to a lower order of paradigm.