6.2 Leçon-2 : Investir dans un esprit régénérateur

L'idée de l'investissement d'impact, qui vise à utiliser la richesse financière comme un moyen d'améliorer le monde, est celle que les banques, les institutions, les entreprises et les particuliers adoptent de plus en plus. Les investisseurs d'impact investissent généralement dans des projets ou des entreprises qui, selon eux, peuvent avoir un effet de levier sur un besoin particulier, comme la restauration de l'environnement, la réduction de la pauvreté ou la réduction du carbone atmosphérique. Cette stratégie diffère de la philanthropie traditionnelle car elle vise à gagner de l'argent. Les investisseurs d'impact pensent que c'est la meilleure méthode pour promouvoir l'initiative et l'esprit d'entreprise tout en s'assurant que le financement est disponible pour plus d'investissements.

L'investissement d'impact est né d'un désir sincère de changer le monde et d'apporter une transformation significative de la façon dont les gens vivent sur la planète. D'une manière générale, il vise à améliorer les dommages socio-écologiques (en utilisant le paradigme du trouble d'arrêt) ou à faire progresser les systèmes humains et naturels.

Nous souhaitons présenter une stratégie alternative d'investissement d'impact basée sur le paradigme régénératif et visant à aller au-delà des ajustements mineurs pour actualiser des systèmes entiers.

A paradigm shift to the regeneration level entails much more than just a simple adjustment to an investor’s approach. It essentially calls for a shift in the way individuals perceive and comprehend their interaction with the outside environment. Because regeneration calls for people to invest themselves as well as their material assets, it also necessitates a change in aspiration and direction toward the activity of investment. Together, this means that it necessitates creating a regenerative mind.

The term “mind” refers to all conscious and unconscious mental activity and processes, such as emotion, habit, reasoning, sensory perception, and so forth. Regeneration is the process of drawing out something’s essence and allowing it to evolve so that it can manifest in a new way and add fresh value to a new environment. Seeing the intrinsic completeness, agency, and potentiality in living phenomena, a regenerative mind actively engages with their innate capacity for regeneration.

Company owners and entrepreneurs who are looking for ways to boost their positive impacts on social and ecological systems. They almost always show a sincere desire to make the world a better place: “We want to make a difference,” they declare. These noble intentions, however, are rarely matched by knowledge and procedures sophisticated enough to bring about lasting change. This is typically the case because the desire to do good is anchored in an outmoded paradigm that has an anthropocentric view of the universe. Those who want to improve the world will naturally define and work toward what they regard as right and good. The same concerns are raised in relation to investment, which has recently seen its definition change. For instance, it is becoming increasingly clear that the phrase need not just refer to traditional financial instruments that offer the promise of a financial return. Moreover, the term “investment” can be used to describe the commitment (or “self-investment”) that involves something besides money, with the hope of receiving positive results.

Impact investing, on the other hand, is concentrated on making it possible for whole-systems actualization to occur. The process through which a system’s innate potential manifests or becomes actual is known as actualization. As a result, it can be inferred that an impact effort is regenerative if it results in systemic changes or evolutionary processes that reveal potential new for a system as a whole. This is very different from assessing consequences in terms of changes in a desired but constrained metric, such the number of homeless individuals who have received housing.

A different investment orientation is necessary to redefine impact in terms of systems actualization. For starters, it necessitates understanding how systems are layered within one another and viewing systems as wholes as opposed to bits and pieces. Additionally, it begins with a system’s nature and questions how it will evolve rather than starting with what we wish to change about it.

Vu d'un point de vue régénérateur, l'investissement n'est plus considéré comme quelque chose qui est apporté pour provoquer un changement (paradigme du bien-être), mais plutôt comme quelque chose qu'un système appelle pour faciliter sa propre évolution (paradigme de régénération de la vie). au-delà de la compréhension conventionnelle et de la pratique acceptée est nécessaire pour développer une pensée véritablement nouvelle afin de faire des découvertes d'ordre supérieur sur la vie sur Terre. Pour ce faire, il faut disposer d'un compréhension des mouvements et des énergies sous-jacents qui servent de base à des tactiques innovantes qui permettent aux systèmes de passer à des degrés d'expression plus élevés et de réaliser leur propre potentiel.

The mind of a regenerative investor must also be regenerative. To do this, one must be prepared to go beyond education and experience in to understand and interact with the environment in novel ways. That is a lengthy, difficult procedure. After all, letting go of one’s certainties and the things that have historically worked is never an easy task. But at this pivotal time in history, this kind of course correction is required. The framework that follows provides an overview of the extent of a process for developing fresh perspectives that make it possible to identify and realize the inherent potential of living systems.

• The phrase “essence-to-essence link” describes the mentality one must adopt: one that recognizes and respects the unique qualities and untapped potential of every living system. We must learn to relate to them as autonomous beings if we are to transition from acting on to working with the natural systems, raw resources, local cultures, and people that our investments and enterprises influence.
• The term “systems evolution” refers to the capacity to see a world of process, dynamism, and flow in which life develops to its full potential and becomes richer, more structured, and more complicated. This applies to the evolution of economies, animals, and ecosystems, as well as societies, and it necessitates accepting ambiguity and uncertainty as the building blocks of original ideas.
• La pensée des systèmes vivants est le processus par lequel l'esprit peut modeler ses actions sur le fonctionnement des systèmes vivants. La théorie des systèmes vivants, par exemple, met davantage l'accent sur les ensembles que sur les fragments, sur le potentiel que sur la réalité, sur l'essence que sur les catégories générales, etc.
• Self-managing and self-determining systems must be capable of managing themselves and making decisions for themselves. This is crucial to shifting relationships with biological systems from extractive or authoritarian to regenerative. At the regenerative level, investing always aims to increase communities’, individuals’, and ecosystems’ capacity to successfully shape their own futures. When this is the case, businesses and investors are appropriately viewed as allies as opposed to predators.
• The ability to keep track of one’s own thoughts and determine which paradigm is influencing it is referred to as discernment levels. Because to ingrained habits and social constraints, working at a regeneration level is impossible without this skill. Instead, one will automatically shift to a lower order of paradigm.